One cannot venture far in modern society without encountering the belief that men—whether through ignorance, negligence or sheer barbarism—are insufficiently vigilant when it comes to ‘putting the toilet seat down’.
It is high time we viewed this issue through a more logical and equitable lens.
Imagine there are an equal number of men and women sharing the use of a given toilet bowl. (Here, ‘man’ is taken to mean ‘a person who, when urinating into a toilet bowl, does so from the upright position’.) Now imagine that each visitor to said toilet—man or woman—places the seat either up or down according to preference and need, then leaves the seat in that position upon the completion of their transaction. One can immediately see that the burden of raising or lowering the seat is shared equally between the sexes.
In fact, the males in this thought-experiment come out as second-class toilet citizens, since a proportion of their lavatory usage will, in the normal course of things, require the seat to be down anyway. It would be unusual for such a visitor to lift the seat again once their appointment has concluded. Therefore, assuming the next visitor is female, they will find to their delight that the seat is in the (optimal) horizontal position and not in the (angst-inducing) vertical position.
All other things being equal (the number of men using the toilet relative to the number of women, the ratio of bladder- to bowel-emptying, attentiveness to the position of the toilet seat and appropriate dealing therewith, etc), for every instance of a man or woman having to lower the toilet seat for the intended use, there will be a slightly greater number of instances of a man having to lift it.
Now consider the sought-after alternative. Imagine that we lived in a world in which men always lowered the toilet seat upon the termination of their lavatorial activities. Would this not also be a world in which women never had to raise the seat? Is this any way to achieve equality between the sexes? No reasonable person could fail to answer in the negative.
Perhaps this feminine insistence that the toilet seat remain in the horizontal position springs from the anxiety of sharing the lavatorial sanctum with the (arguably) less refined representative of the species. By keeping the toilet seat lowered, one need never acknowledge that the seat was, at some point, raised. One need never encounter evidence that the toilet has, in the immediate past, been the temporary receptacle for urine de l’homme. Were this indeed the case, it would not be too extreme to view it as an attempt to porcelain-wash men from the toilet picture.
Indeed, a by-product of the current confusion over who should raise or lower the seat (and when) is that we actually risk defiling the lavatorial space with unignorable and needlessly unpleasant evidence of male visitation. For while the consequences of accidentally sitting on the toilet when the seat is raised include mild embarrassment and the possibility of sustaining a bruised rump, the consequences of accidentally urinating into the toilet from the upright position while the seat is lowered include—but are not limited to—getting piss everywhere.
SLIMEJAM ST. HERPESCHOIR (@SLIMEJAM), MELBOURNE